Shabbat Forshpeis
A Taste of Torah in Honor of Shabbat
PARSHAT VA-YESHEV
SEEMINGLY MINOR ACTS CAN HAVE MAJOR REVERBERATIONS
NOVEMEBR 28-29, 2002/ 24 KISLEV 5763
Why does Reuven do all within
his power to prevent the sale of Yosef?
Rav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik of blessed memory once suggested that the answer lies in an analysis of a Midrash dealing with Reuven having relations with, his father, Yaakovs (Jacob) wife Bilhah. (Genesis 35:22)
According to the Midrash, Reuven did not actually commit this deed. Rather, "when Rachel died, Yaakov took his bed which was placed regularly in the tent of Rachel. . ...and placed it in the tent of Bilhah. Reuven came and resented the insult to his mother and said, "if my mother Leah was subordinate to Rachel, must she also be subordinate to Rachel's handmaid?" Therefore, he disarranged [Yaakovs bed by moving it to Leah's tent]. (Rashi) Still, the Torah considers this action to be so heinous that it would be equivalent to Reuven actually having had relations with Bilhah.
Although the Torah considers it a terrible sin, on its face, Reuven's sin seems minor. His intention was to simply show respect to his mother. Yet, it is here that Rav Soloveitchik notes that every act has two elements. First, the act itself, and second, its consequences. At times, an action may seem innocuous but its impact may be great.
In this instance, from the perspective of the deed itself, Reuven had done little wrong. However, the consequence of the deed was the showing of disrespect to his father and an indication to his brothers that Yaakov could be challenged.
Hence, Reuven takes the lead in protecting Yosef as he views himself responsible for the brothers being brazen enough to challenge their father by selling his favorite son.
No wonder then, after Yosef was sold, Reuven rended his garments and declares, "the child is not [there]. And as for me, whither shall I go?" (Genesis 37:29, 30) Thus, Reuven feels personally responsible for having planted the seeds that precipitated the sale.
I remember clearly the Rav bringing his analysis to a crescendo with his famous _expression, "and I'll clinch it." He did this by pointing out that Reuven was not present during the sale. And Rashi, wondering where he was, notes the Midrash which states that Reuven "was occupied with his sackcloth and his fasting because he had disarranged the couch of his father." (Rashi on Genesis 37:29) In other words, Reuven understood that he needed to fast for that wrong, as it was the cause of his brother's disrespect.
The message is clear: we must be careful with every deed. A deed, in and of itself, may be minor, but its impact may have unexpected ramifications.
Rabbi Avi Weiss
|
|
|
